Quick guide to better battery cost comparisons
When it comes to choosing batteries for home or commercial energy storage, it can be difficult to sift through the multitude of options to find the IDEAL battery for your application.
The options range from different operating voltages, amp-hour (Ah) storage capacities, sizes, weights, brands and – to make things even more complicated – different battery chemistries.
What is most important, however, is that the chosen model(s) provides electricity to the site when needed – either for regular use, time shifting or as a back-up supply – and at the best value price.
This article discusses important issues surrounding effective cost comparisons between different battery technologies – technologies which can vary greatly in a number of important performance characteristics such as nominal cycle lifetime, recommended depth of discharge (DoD) and round-trip storage efficiencies.
Be Sue to see our recommened Batteryas we consider it the best long term battery life span 80 years Nickel Iron .
$/kWh just doesn’t cut it
Because the task of battery selection can be so complex, most media articles on the matter tend to simplify figures and compare batteries based on their $/kWhcapacity value. To calculate this figure, the price of the batteries is simply divided by the nominal storage capacity at full charge.
Although somewhat useful in comparing batteries of the same type across brands and models, this metric can be inaccurate and quite misleading because it does not take into account the following important factors:
The cycle life of the battery: If the battery only lasts one cycle (as opposed to say 5,000 cycles) then the price of each kWh you extract from the battery would be astronomically high! This figure is typically given as the number of cycles it takes for the true battery storage capacity at full charge to reach 80% of the nominal capacity, given as a function of DoD (below).
Depth of discharge (DoD): The depth of discharge specifies what percentage of the battery capacity has been used. For example, if a 10kWh nominal capacity battery has 5kWh stored in then its current DoD is 50% – if it has 2kWh left in storage then its DoD is 80%. Batteries simply can’t be drained of all their stored energy. In most cases, doing this would cause irreversible damage to its components. Batteries are typically specified a recommended maximum DoD for their nominal cycle lifetime (e.g. 3,000 cycles at a DoD of 50%) and the expected cycle life of a battery tends to decrease as the DoD is increased.
An example graph of battery cycle life as a function of DoD [Image Source: Electropaedia]
Round-trip efficiency: This can be thought of as the amount of energy that can be extracted from a battery as a percentage of the amount of input energy it took to store it.
For example, if 1kWh of electricity is fed into a battery and the amount of energy which can be extracted from that input is only 800Wh then the efficiency of the battery is 80%. The loss in energy is caused by heat or other inefficiencies within the system. In truth, the round trip efficiency is actually dependent on the battery’s DoD – however, this figure is typically given just as the average.
As outlined above, the $/kWh figure is nowhere near sufficient to fairly contrast competing battery models and types. In order to progress the discussion further, we need to introduce a more appropriate metric, the cost of stored stored energy (COS). This is a much closer approximation to the true cost of battery storage.
Sample calculations for COS
The three hypothetical batteries listed below will be compared against each other based on their respective $/kWh and COS values to provide the consumer with as much insight as possible before buying a battery. Ultimately, this analysis will provide a more accurate view of which battery stores energy at lowest cost compared to the rest (i.e. has the lowest COS). A similar approach can be used to compare any other battery with available information.
A spectrum of choices
There are many more additional factors which can be considered – such as maintenance, toxicity, safety and disposal – to compare against but as the examples above have highlighted, looking at commonly available fine print can cut through the mess and help you identify the best value battery storage options.